4-3-3 formation weakness points: 1. The system relies on good defensive discipline from the number six to protect the defence, if this isn’t the case then the back four can be easily exposed. The 3-4-3 formation is one of the most commonly used structures in the Premier League as it allows teams to spread wide across the pitch. The critical cogs in a working 3-4-3 formation system are its wingbacks. They form a crucial part of the attack mostly but must transition back into defend, similar to a box-to-box midfielder.
Teams that have very good central midfielders can use those players to create, and everyone else can fill in the gaps. The wingers on teams that use this format also need to be extremely talented when the formation changes from time to time. Even though it is known as a 4-3-3, it morphs into a 4-5-1 on defense.
So why does any of this matter? Well, a 4-3-3 is a very good formation for lots of possession. That is why it is the go to shape for Pep Guardiola and Maurizio Sarri. A 4-2-3-1 has a more natural
Football Manager 2022 tactics: 4-2-3-1: For positive, possession-based managers. If holding onto the ball is your jam, then a 4-3-3 is often the formation to go with. With this 4-2-3-1 though
3. thesublimeobjekt • 7 mo. ago. It’s strange for real. It’s considered my more defensive formation of the 3 I use (442, 4231, 433 (4)) and it seems to be the formation I’m using most often for offense i’ve fire power. Maybe down to tactics. 3. wonderballs92 • 7 mo. ago. 4-3-3 (2) has always been my go to.
One of the most common variations of the 4-1-4-1 formation is the 4-3-3. This formation is similar to the 4-1-4-1, but with a few key differences. In the 4-3-3, the two wide midfielders push up higher on the field, creating a more attacking formation. The central midfielder drops back to provide support to the lone defensive midfielder. igQ0.
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/513
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/154
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/768
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/388
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/40
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/373
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/898
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/852
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/909
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/604
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/290
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/434
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/687
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/440
  • tdmw16urb2.pages.dev/992
  • is 4 3 3 a good formation